Direction Judgments for Moving Plaids and Gratings

Investigation of a patient with severely impaired direction discrimination: evidence against the intersection-of-constraints model.

Jonathan D. Victor and Mary M. Conte

Vision Research 34, 267-277 (1994)

Abstract

A man with presumed posterior cortical atrophy (Benson, Davis, & Snyder, 1988) had a markedly elevated threshold for orientation discrimination (approximately 25 deg) and selective impairment of "pop-out" tasks based on orientation. Direction discrimination for moving plaids was superior to direction discrimination for their component gratings. The superior performance for plaids disappeared when the spatial frequencies of the component gratings were altered to eliminate coherence.

This finding implies that extraction of plaid motion is not dependent on pre-processing within narrow spatial frequency bands. It is inconsistent with simulations based on the "intersection of constraints" model (Adelson & Movshon, 1982), which predict that the error rate for plaids would be larger than the error rate for gratings, particularly for the plaids composed of gratings moving at nearly opposing angles. It is consistent with models such as the Heeger (1987) model, which extract direction from the pattern of activity across broadly-tuned spatiotemporal filters.


Download
Publications related to motion processing
Return to publications list